NEW DELHI : Because the dispute between Punjab and Haryana over the Sutlej-Yamuna Hyperlink (SYL) canal mission has been lingering for many years with no sight of decision, the Supreme Courtroom on Thursday appealed to each states to not be inflexible and undertake a ‘give-and-take’ strategy to resolve the difficulty and are available out with an answer.
A bench of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Ahsanuddin Amanullah and Aravind Kumar additionally appealed to the Centre to be pro-active and play the function of a mediator in resolving the dispute between the 2 neighbouring states. It mentioned the Centre is the ultimate arbiter in issues referring to inter-state water disputes and the federal government shouldn’t be amute spectator.
“We count on the states to sit down collectively to discover a approach ahead. We name upon the states to carry conferences extra continuously and on the degree of the very best political dispensation so that there’s some progress within the dialogue,” the bench mentioned. “The Centre is the ultimate arbiter in such a dispute. Why don’t you play a extra energetic function and never stay a mute spectator. These are very complicated points,” the bench informed legal professional common Ok Venkataramani and posted the case for listening to in October.
A bench of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Ahsanuddin Amanullah and Aravind Kumar additionally appealed to the Centre to be pro-active and play the function of a mediator in resolving the dispute between the 2 neighbouring states. It mentioned the Centre is the ultimate arbiter in issues referring to inter-state water disputes and the federal government shouldn’t be amute spectator.
“We count on the states to sit down collectively to discover a approach ahead. We name upon the states to carry conferences extra continuously and on the degree of the very best political dispensation so that there’s some progress within the dialogue,” the bench mentioned. “The Centre is the ultimate arbiter in such a dispute. Why don’t you play a extra energetic function and never stay a mute spectator. These are very complicated points,” the bench informed legal professional common Ok Venkataramani and posted the case for listening to in October.
